New Comments as of 5/18Total Pupil Expenditures (
Per Mass Dept of Education)
District----------------------------Number of students (FTE)
1999 . . . . . . . . . . $10,192,294 . . . . . . . . . . .1,914
2003. . . . . . . . . . $16,028,479 . . . . . . . . . . .2,546
2007 (est) . . . . . $25,000,000. . . . . . . . . . .3,000 (est)
1999-2003 funding - 36% Increase
1999-2003 students - 25% Increase
2003-2007 funding - 36% Increase
2003-2007 students - 15% Increase
The 2007 numbers are before the override.
Question: Over the two five year periods here, why does it cost 10% more for the same increase in student population from 2003 to 2007? What percentage are teacher salaries and what percentage is administration?
Question: If these numbers hold true over the next ten years does that mean the school budget will be $34,000,000 in 2012 and $46,000,000 in 2017, nearly double what it is today?
Remember none of these numbers include the cost of building new schools. New students entering the system have been dropping for 2 years. Yes, utilities are way up, we pay them also. All the more reason to question the affordability of the extra 4% for "improvement" the District wants in an override this year.
Is the override necessary? We don't think it is.