"Example, the most recent post on Eye on the Gray property makes the statement that the building comm brought the selectmen to the Morrison property " at least one of them kicking and screaming ". Of course they are refering to the BOS chair that eye has an obvious political agenda against. Do you want to know the real story? The drop dead date for the buyer to come up with the money for the Gray property was Aug 20. The building comm had scheduled a tentative meeting for the 21st in the hope that the buyer would fail to get the money and the town could jump in. However, the buyers realized they would not get the money and notified the Grays a little over a week before the Aug 20th drop dead date. The BOS chair got wind of all this and emailed the building comm with the new info. She further suggested that the building comm post a meeting as soon as was legally possible for the purpose of touring the property and voting on a recomendation to the BOS for them to act upon which they did. To say that anybody on the BOS had to be dragged kicking and screaming is a gross misrepresentation of the facts and a blatant example of someone pursuing their political agenda at the expense of the truth." Mendon Tao 8/25/2006 12:22:00 AM
If the above is true then how do you explain the following. These are from the minutes of the Public Safety Building Committee meeting on JUNE 19, 2006:
"J. Cronin states there is a new development that M. Ammendolia and J. Reed are exploring, and G. Smith presented property at 8 Morrison Drive to the committee.
Looking at plans, J. Cronin states that the Fire Department could move in tomorrow.
J. Reed asks if we bring the Morrison Drive property to the town, will we get a reprieve from the DOS? L. Tinio states yes.
N. Bradley would like the architect to look at this property. S. Cutler wants to wait and consider this property after the survey results are compiled.
J. Cronin states the committee is not leaving without a decision. The BOS needs to pursue this alternative.
S. Cutler states she will not put this on the agenda at a Selectmen’s meeting till the survey results are in. If G. Carell wants to look at it great, at no extra cost. "
The Committee wanted to look at the Morrisson propertya full 2 months before Augest 20 and Cutler said no way. Why you ask? The fact that her good buddy Judy Lionelli was the broker that had a potential buyer may have had something to do with it. Sharon didn't want to cut her friend out of a six-figure comission. Note to self: Do you get a finders fee for NOT bringing in a buyer? Only after Leonelli’s client fell through did Sharon become interested in the Morrison land. Coincidental timing? You make the call.
Yes we do attack sometimes but they usually have it coming. Judy Lionelli and Sharon Cutler are two peas in a pod. They are in it for themselves. You go girls.
